<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (9) TMI 67 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56866</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order under sec. 263, clarifying the inclusion of IAC (Asstt.) orders for revision. The decision emphasized harmonious interpretation of statutory provisions, based on legal precedents and legislative intent. It highlighted the need for proper enquiry into the disputed deduction, ensuring procedural fairness for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 11:48:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (9) TMI 67 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56866</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order under sec. 263, clarifying the inclusion of IAC (Asstt.) orders for revision. The decision emphasized harmonious interpretation of statutory provisions, based on legal precedents and legislative intent. It highlighted the need for proper enquiry into the disputed deduction, ensuring procedural fairness for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>