<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 126 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56861</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reinstated the penalty imposed by the ITO, emphasizing the lack of credible explanations and evidence presented by the assessee to refute the allegations of concealment. The Tribunal found that the CIT (A) did not adequately consider the evidence and failed to provide sufficient reasoning to support the reduction in penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 11:15:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 126 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56861</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reinstated the penalty imposed by the ITO, emphasizing the lack of credible explanations and evidence presented by the assessee to refute the allegations of concealment. The Tribunal found that the CIT (A) did not adequately consider the evidence and failed to provide sufficient reasoning to support the reduction in penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>