<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (2) TMI 90 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56851</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the AAC&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal against the rejection of the assessee&#039;s application under section 154 by the ITO. The Tribunal emphasized the need for clear, apparent mistakes to be rectified under section 154 and highlighted the importance of following prescribed procedures for challenging assessments under the Income-tax Act. The discretionary decisions made by the ITO regarding disallowances were deemed non-apparent mistakes and not subject to rectification under section 154.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 10:37:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (2) TMI 90 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56851</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the AAC&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal against the rejection of the assessee&#039;s application under section 154 by the ITO. The Tribunal emphasized the need for clear, apparent mistakes to be rectified under section 154 and highlighted the importance of following prescribed procedures for challenging assessments under the Income-tax Act. The discretionary decisions made by the ITO regarding disallowances were deemed non-apparent mistakes and not subject to rectification under section 154.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>