<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (8) TMI 123 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56828</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision declaring the assessment void due to a defective notice issued in the name of a deceased assessee. It emphasized that a valid notice under section 148 is essential for reassessment jurisdiction, and section 292B cannot cure a notice that is void ab initio. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, stating that the notice&#039;s validity is crucial for the entire reassessment process, in line with established court decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:33:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (8) TMI 123 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56828</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision declaring the assessment void due to a defective notice issued in the name of a deceased assessee. It emphasized that a valid notice under section 148 is essential for reassessment jurisdiction, and section 292B cannot cure a notice that is void ab initio. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, stating that the notice&#039;s validity is crucial for the entire reassessment process, in line with established court decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>