<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (4) TMI 109 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56821</link>
    <description>Section 159 limits a deceased person&#039;s tax liability to income that accrued, arose, or was received before death, so post-death income cannot be assessed in the deceased&#039;s hands through a legal representative. Income first arising after death belongs to the estate or other proper successor under the relevant post-death assessment provision. Interest and dividend income also require item-wise examination, because accrual may differ by period and must be split between pre-death and post-death income for correct assessment of the liable person. Fresh factual verification was therefore necessary to apportion the taxable income correctly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:17:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (4) TMI 109 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56821</link>
      <description>Section 159 limits a deceased person&#039;s tax liability to income that accrued, arose, or was received before death, so post-death income cannot be assessed in the deceased&#039;s hands through a legal representative. Income first arising after death belongs to the estate or other proper successor under the relevant post-death assessment provision. Interest and dividend income also require item-wise examination, because accrual may differ by period and must be split between pre-death and post-death income for correct assessment of the liable person. Fresh factual verification was therefore necessary to apportion the taxable income correctly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>