<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (4) TMI 64 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56742</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by permitting future manufacturing under certain conditions and referring the excise duty liability issue back to the ITO pending a final decision by the High Court. The Tribunal directed the ITO to allow the deduction claim if the High Court ruled in favor of the assessee. However, the disallowed expenses towards advertisement and sale promotion were upheld by the Tribunal, siding with the ITO&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:37:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (4) TMI 64 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56742</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by permitting future manufacturing under certain conditions and referring the excise duty liability issue back to the ITO pending a final decision by the High Court. The Tribunal directed the ITO to allow the deduction claim if the High Court ruled in favor of the assessee. However, the disallowed expenses towards advertisement and sale promotion were upheld by the Tribunal, siding with the ITO&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>