<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (5) TMI 38 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56721</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the partial partition claimed by the HUF, emphasizing the legal rights of the coparcener son to effect the partition, the significance of book entries, and the execution of a valid partition deed. The decision was based on a comprehensive analysis of relevant case laws supporting the validity of the claimed partition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 14:25:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (5) TMI 38 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56721</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the partial partition claimed by the HUF, emphasizing the legal rights of the coparcener son to effect the partition, the significance of book entries, and the execution of a valid partition deed. The decision was based on a comprehensive analysis of relevant case laws supporting the validity of the claimed partition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>