<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (9) TMI 66 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56659</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, restoring the ITO&#039;s additions for the valuation of seized stock and dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal on the deletion of the interest account. It held that seized assets retained under section 132(5) should be included in the closing stock for valuation, as ownership remained with the assessee and the assets were not confiscated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 11:38:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (9) TMI 66 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56659</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, restoring the ITO&#039;s additions for the valuation of seized stock and dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal on the deletion of the interest account. It held that seized assets retained under section 132(5) should be included in the closing stock for valuation, as ownership remained with the assessee and the assets were not confiscated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>