<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (1) TMI 131 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56646</link>
    <description>The appeals were partly allowed. The interest from Banarasidas Ramgopal was to be taxed on a receipt basis, adhering to the cash system of accounting followed by the assessee. However, the exemption under Section 11 was denied due to the application of Section 13(1)(c) and Section 13(2)(a), as the loan was not backed by adequate security, even though it carried adequate interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 11:01:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (1) TMI 131 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56646</link>
      <description>The appeals were partly allowed. The interest from Banarasidas Ramgopal was to be taxed on a receipt basis, adhering to the cash system of accounting followed by the assessee. However, the exemption under Section 11 was denied due to the application of Section 13(1)(c) and Section 13(2)(a), as the loan was not backed by adequate security, even though it carried adequate interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>