<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (5) TMI 33 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56634</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed both appeals, emphasizing procedural compliance, the importance of actual entries in block assessments, and the reasonable acceptance of explanations for cash savings. The Tribunal upheld an addition of Rs. 92,490 as undisclosed income for the assessment year 1996-97, directing the Assessing Officer to calculate the proportionate addition. However, the Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 25,000 representing unexplained cash, noting the credibility of the assessees&#039; explanation as reputable pathologists. The defects in the notice issued under section 158BC(a) were deemed curable under section 292B of the Income-tax Act, given the assessees&#039; understanding and compliance with the notice during assessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:15:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (5) TMI 33 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56634</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed both appeals, emphasizing procedural compliance, the importance of actual entries in block assessments, and the reasonable acceptance of explanations for cash savings. The Tribunal upheld an addition of Rs. 92,490 as undisclosed income for the assessment year 1996-97, directing the Assessing Officer to calculate the proportionate addition. However, the Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 25,000 representing unexplained cash, noting the credibility of the assessees&#039; explanation as reputable pathologists. The defects in the notice issued under section 158BC(a) were deemed curable under section 292B of the Income-tax Act, given the assessees&#039; understanding and compliance with the notice during assessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>