<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (3) TMI 98 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56621</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the penalty for the unexplained investment of Rs. 71,365 under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, 1961. However, no penalty was imposed for the Rs. 15,000 income from trading in gold ornaments as the business resulted in a loss.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 18:43:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (3) TMI 98 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56621</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the penalty for the unexplained investment of Rs. 71,365 under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, 1961. However, no penalty was imposed for the Rs. 15,000 income from trading in gold ornaments as the business resulted in a loss.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>