<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (8) TMI 93 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56611</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the term &quot;house&quot; under section 7(4) of the Wealth-tax Act includes the entire land used as part of the house, rejecting the Commissioner&#039;s narrower interpretation. As a result, the Tribunal found the Wealth-tax Officer&#039;s assessment for the assessment year 1976-77 to be correct and not prejudicial to revenue. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order under section 25(2) and allowed the appeal of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 18:06:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (8) TMI 93 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56611</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the term &quot;house&quot; under section 7(4) of the Wealth-tax Act includes the entire land used as part of the house, rejecting the Commissioner&#039;s narrower interpretation. As a result, the Tribunal found the Wealth-tax Officer&#039;s assessment for the assessment year 1976-77 to be correct and not prejudicial to revenue. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order under section 25(2) and allowed the appeal of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>