<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (3) TMI 88 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56593</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, upholding the assessee&#039;s entitlement to relief under section 35B for the commission paid for maintaining the agency. The tribunal rejected the department&#039;s argument regarding the value of samples for relief under section 35B. It clarified the interpretation of &#039;maintenance of an agency&#039; under the provision, affirming the assessee&#039;s eligibility for the deduction based on the expenditure incurred for maintaining the agency relationship with the German firm.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 17:11:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (3) TMI 88 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56593</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, upholding the assessee&#039;s entitlement to relief under section 35B for the commission paid for maintaining the agency. The tribunal rejected the department&#039;s argument regarding the value of samples for relief under section 35B. It clarified the interpretation of &#039;maintenance of an agency&#039; under the provision, affirming the assessee&#039;s eligibility for the deduction based on the expenditure incurred for maintaining the agency relationship with the German firm.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>