<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (3) TMI 87 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56592</link>
    <description>Additional evidence at the appellate stage may be admitted only where it is necessary for proper adjudication and the party gives a satisfactory explanation for not producing it earlier. A new plea may be entertained when the supporting material is already on record, but not where both the plea and the evidence are introduced for the first time without justification. On the facts, the letter sought to be filed for the first time was rightly refused, while the remaining documents justified reconsideration by the first appellate authority after hearing both sides. The assessment was therefore set aside only to the limited extent of remand, without any decision on the merits of the rental income claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 17:09:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (3) TMI 87 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56592</link>
      <description>Additional evidence at the appellate stage may be admitted only where it is necessary for proper adjudication and the party gives a satisfactory explanation for not producing it earlier. A new plea may be entertained when the supporting material is already on record, but not where both the plea and the evidence are introduced for the first time without justification. On the facts, the letter sought to be filed for the first time was rightly refused, while the remaining documents justified reconsideration by the first appellate authority after hearing both sides. The assessment was therefore set aside only to the limited extent of remand, without any decision on the merits of the rental income claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>