<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (2) TMI 110 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56591</link>
    <description>The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dismissed the appeal, ruling against the assessee&#039;s claim for the deduction of the short-term capital loss of Rs. 18,993. The tribunal held that the advances made were not in the nature of a capital asset, as they were not acknowledged as loans repayable by the company. Without clear evidence supporting the characterization of the amounts as loans, the claimed loss was disallowed under section 71(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 17:07:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (2) TMI 110 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56591</link>
      <description>The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dismissed the appeal, ruling against the assessee&#039;s claim for the deduction of the short-term capital loss of Rs. 18,993. The tribunal held that the advances made were not in the nature of a capital asset, as they were not acknowledged as loans repayable by the company. Without clear evidence supporting the characterization of the amounts as loans, the claimed loss was disallowed under section 71(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>