<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (2) TMI 57 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56578</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the husband lacked technical or professional qualifications, and his salary was not solely attributable to specialized knowledge or experience. Emphasizing the conjunctive nature of the proviso in section 64(1)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which requires both technical qualifications and income attribution to technical knowledge, the appeal was dismissed, upholding the income clubbing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 16:26:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (2) TMI 57 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56578</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the husband lacked technical or professional qualifications, and his salary was not solely attributable to specialized knowledge or experience. Emphasizing the conjunctive nature of the proviso in section 64(1)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which requires both technical qualifications and income attribution to technical knowledge, the appeal was dismissed, upholding the income clubbing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>