<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 151 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56552</link>
    <description>The Tribunal canceled penalties under Sections 271(1)(c) and 271(1)(a) of the IT Act as the Department failed to establish a direct link between the balance sheet and the assessee. The burden of proof was not adequately shifted back to the Department, and the delay in filing the return was found to be due to a bona fide belief that income was below the taxable limit. Both penalties were canceled, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 14:03:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 151 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56552</link>
      <description>The Tribunal canceled penalties under Sections 271(1)(c) and 271(1)(a) of the IT Act as the Department failed to establish a direct link between the balance sheet and the assessee. The burden of proof was not adequately shifted back to the Department, and the delay in filing the return was found to be due to a bona fide belief that income was below the taxable limit. Both penalties were canceled, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>