https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56537 The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, a medical practitioner, in a tax case involving the addition of Rs. 11,000 as income from undisclosed sources. The appellant successfully argued that the amounts received from two creditors were specific loans and gifts, not undisclosed income. The Tribunal accepted the evidence provided by the lenders and ruled that the burden of proof was met by the appellant, ultimately deleting the Rs. 11,000 addition and allowing the appeal. en-us Wed, 11 Jul 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Dec 2010 13:01:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56537 The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, a medical practitioner, in a tax case involving the addition of Rs. 11,000 as income from undisclosed sources. The appellant successfully argued that the amounts received from two creditors were specific loans and gifts, not undisclosed income. The Tribunal accepted the evidence provided by the lenders and ruled that the burden of proof was met by the appellant, ultimately deleting the Rs. 11,000 addition and allowing the appeal. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 11 Jul 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56537