<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (2) TMI 43 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56528</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the AAC&#039;s decision to delete the additions made by the ITO under s. 40-A(3) of the IT Act for the assessment year 1972-73. The Tribunal found a direct correlation between the cash payments and goods supplied by N.P.K. Fertilisers, considering the genuine nature of the payments and business expediency. Despite the Department&#039;s arguments, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, concluding that the cash deposits were justified under r. 6-DD(j)(2) and did not warrant addition to the total income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 12:44:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (2) TMI 43 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56528</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the AAC&#039;s decision to delete the additions made by the ITO under s. 40-A(3) of the IT Act for the assessment year 1972-73. The Tribunal found a direct correlation between the cash payments and goods supplied by N.P.K. Fertilisers, considering the genuine nature of the payments and business expediency. Despite the Department&#039;s arguments, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, concluding that the cash deposits were justified under r. 6-DD(j)(2) and did not warrant addition to the total income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>