<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 252 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56514</link>
    <description>Remittances received under the special foreign exchange enactment were treated as outside income-tax proceedings under section 4, even where the assessee did not obtain immunity under section 3 and the declaration was filed late. Section 4 was read as operating independently of section 3: it excludes such remittances from consideration in proceedings under the Income-tax Act, while the Explanation preserves taxability only of income arising from those remittances. The Board&#039;s circular was treated as binding on tax authorities and consistent with that reading. Foreign exchange receipts received during the scheme period therefore could not be treated as unexplained deposits, and the addition under section 69 failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 11:50:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 252 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56514</link>
      <description>Remittances received under the special foreign exchange enactment were treated as outside income-tax proceedings under section 4, even where the assessee did not obtain immunity under section 3 and the declaration was filed late. Section 4 was read as operating independently of section 3: it excludes such remittances from consideration in proceedings under the Income-tax Act, while the Explanation preserves taxability only of income arising from those remittances. The Board&#039;s circular was treated as binding on tax authorities and consistent with that reading. Foreign exchange receipts received during the scheme period therefore could not be treated as unexplained deposits, and the addition under section 69 failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>