https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56504 The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Application seeking recall of an order and restoration of an appeal. The Bench noted it was the third application for recall, with previous rejections. The Tribunal emphasized that rectification under section 25(2) of the Act was not permissible for the situation. Referring to a Supreme Court decision, it warned against repetitive applications causing disorder in the legal process. The Tribunal, while not branding the assessee as unscrupulous, highlighted the repetitive nature of the applications and denied the current Misc. Application, underscoring the consequences of filing such repetitive applications. en-us Fri, 29 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Dec 2010 10:58:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56504 The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Application seeking recall of an order and restoration of an appeal. The Bench noted it was the third application for recall, with previous rejections. The Tribunal emphasized that rectification under section 25(2) of the Act was not permissible for the situation. Referring to a Supreme Court decision, it warned against repetitive applications causing disorder in the legal process. The Tribunal, while not branding the assessee as unscrupulous, highlighted the repetitive nature of the applications and denied the current Misc. Application, underscoring the consequences of filing such repetitive applications. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 29 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56504