<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 172 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56494</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, upholding an addition of Rs. 33,000 for unexplained cash while deleting the remaining amount. The addition of Rs. 7,39,082 for non-genuine expenses was overturned due to proper documentation and payment proofs. Additionally, the Rs. 30,000 addition for household withdrawals was deleted. The ITAT directed the AO to make consequential adjustments for interest charges and dismissed grounds related to the burden of proof and evidence as not pressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 172 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56494</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, upholding an addition of Rs. 33,000 for unexplained cash while deleting the remaining amount. The addition of Rs. 7,39,082 for non-genuine expenses was overturned due to proper documentation and payment proofs. Additionally, the Rs. 30,000 addition for household withdrawals was deleted. The ITAT directed the AO to make consequential adjustments for interest charges and dismissed grounds related to the burden of proof and evidence as not pressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>