<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 281 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56480</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and instructing the AO to reassess the appellant&#039;s interest liability under section 234C. The Tribunal determined that the appellant, due to the specific provisions related to Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) and advance tax liability, was not obligated to pay the first installment of advance tax for the relevant assessment year. Consequently, the appellant was found not liable for interest under section 234C.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 19:08:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 281 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56480</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and instructing the AO to reassess the appellant&#039;s interest liability under section 234C. The Tribunal determined that the appellant, due to the specific provisions related to Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) and advance tax liability, was not obligated to pay the first installment of advance tax for the relevant assessment year. Consequently, the appellant was found not liable for interest under section 234C.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>