<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 428 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56477</link>
    <description>The appeals resulted in mixed outcomes: the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on several issues, including the exclusion of excise duty refund from business profits for deduction u/s 80HHC and the inclusion of processing charges. It allowed deductions for advertising expenses and public issue expenditures, while denying deductions on rental income u/s 80-I/IA. Some issues, such as deductions for manufacturing at third-party premises, were remanded to the AO for reconsideration. The Tribunal also directed adjustments for depreciation on energy-saving devices and allowed the exclusion of excise duty and sales tax from total turnover for deduction computations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2024 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 428 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56477</link>
      <description>The appeals resulted in mixed outcomes: the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on several issues, including the exclusion of excise duty refund from business profits for deduction u/s 80HHC and the inclusion of processing charges. It allowed deductions for advertising expenses and public issue expenditures, while denying deductions on rental income u/s 80-I/IA. Some issues, such as deductions for manufacturing at third-party premises, were remanded to the AO for reconsideration. The Tribunal also directed adjustments for depreciation on energy-saving devices and allowed the exclusion of excise duty and sales tax from total turnover for deduction computations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>