<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (5) TMI 32 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56434</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found no justification for the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for concealing income particulars. The assessee&#039;s claim for deduction under section 80T was based on judicial pronouncements and made in good faith, supported by legal precedents. The Tribunal agreed that the assessee acted transparently and did not conceal income particulars, ultimately deleting the penalty and allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 16:24:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (5) TMI 32 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56434</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found no justification for the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for concealing income particulars. The assessee&#039;s claim for deduction under section 80T was based on judicial pronouncements and made in good faith, supported by legal precedents. The Tribunal agreed that the assessee acted transparently and did not conceal income particulars, ultimately deleting the penalty and allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>