<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 108 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56431</link>
    <description>Exemption under section 5(1)(ii)(a) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 was held to depend on the situs of the movable property gifted, and a gift made and accepted within Jammu and Kashmir retained that territorial protection. The transaction was carried out through separate bank accounts and cheques at Srinagar, and the statutory benefit was not denied merely by recharacterising the arrangement on a substance-over-form basis. The earlier appellate view granting exemption was supported, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 16:17:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 108 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56431</link>
      <description>Exemption under section 5(1)(ii)(a) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 was held to depend on the situs of the movable property gifted, and a gift made and accepted within Jammu and Kashmir retained that territorial protection. The transaction was carried out through separate bank accounts and cheques at Srinagar, and the statutory benefit was not denied merely by recharacterising the arrangement on a substance-over-form basis. The earlier appellate view granting exemption was supported, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>