<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 107 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56422</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for assessment years 1989-90 and 1990-91, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. The assessee was permitted to claim depreciation as per IT Rules, no interest under Section 234B was applicable on income determined under Section 115J, and the deduction under Section 80HHC was upheld despite the audit report being unsigned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 15:50:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 107 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56422</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for assessment years 1989-90 and 1990-91, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. The assessee was permitted to claim depreciation as per IT Rules, no interest under Section 234B was applicable on income determined under Section 115J, and the deduction under Section 80HHC was upheld despite the audit report being unsigned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>