<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (4) TMI 78 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56411</link>
    <description>Independent partnership concerns cannot be disregarded or clubbed with a main firm merely because they share premises, employees, or family participation; positive evidence is required to prove that they are sham or benami entities and that their income ly belongs to the main concern. On the facts noted, the sister concerns were treated as genuine and separately assessable, so refusal of registration or continuation of registration was not sustained. Once that finding stood, inter-firm interest could not be disallowed as a mere book adjustment, and a lump-sum gross profit addition was unjustified where purchases, sales, and stock records were supported and no specific defect in the accounts was shown.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 03:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (4) TMI 78 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56411</link>
      <description>Independent partnership concerns cannot be disregarded or clubbed with a main firm merely because they share premises, employees, or family participation; positive evidence is required to prove that they are sham or benami entities and that their income ly belongs to the main concern. On the facts noted, the sister concerns were treated as genuine and separately assessable, so refusal of registration or continuation of registration was not sustained. Once that finding stood, inter-firm interest could not be disallowed as a mere book adjustment, and a lump-sum gross profit addition was unjustified where purchases, sales, and stock records were supported and no specific defect in the accounts was shown.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>