<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (6) TMI 40 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56409</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal partly for statistical purposes. The dismissal of the appeal under section 80HHC was set aside, emphasizing procedural compliance over strict adherence. The disallowance of entertainment expenses under section 37(2A) was upheld due to lack of clarity on staff-related expenses. The disallowance from miscellaneous expenses was overturned as audited accounts were deemed accurate without evidence of disallowable expenses. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to decide the claim based on merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 14:53:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (6) TMI 40 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56409</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal partly for statistical purposes. The dismissal of the appeal under section 80HHC was set aside, emphasizing procedural compliance over strict adherence. The disallowance of entertainment expenses under section 37(2A) was upheld due to lack of clarity on staff-related expenses. The disallowance from miscellaneous expenses was overturned as audited accounts were deemed accurate without evidence of disallowable expenses. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to decide the claim based on merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>