<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (3) TMI 131 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56401</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal upholding some of the Dy. CIT(A)&#039;s decisions and modifying others to align with market valuations and legal precedents. Key points included the valuation of properties at Bhaktinagar and Shiyabaug, allowance for co-ownership deduction, repairs and maintenance deductions, assessment of rental values, and the rate of interest for capitalization of income. The Tribunal favored market-based valuations and legal precedents in determining fair values and deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 14:05:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (3) TMI 131 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56401</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal upholding some of the Dy. CIT(A)&#039;s decisions and modifying others to align with market valuations and legal precedents. Key points included the valuation of properties at Bhaktinagar and Shiyabaug, allowance for co-ownership deduction, repairs and maintenance deductions, assessment of rental values, and the rate of interest for capitalization of income. The Tribunal favored market-based valuations and legal precedents in determining fair values and deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>