<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (2) TMI 90 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56397</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, emphasizing that the choice of the accounting method should be left to the assessee. The Tribunal directed the Income Tax Officer to compute the income based on the cash method chosen by the assessee, rejecting the hybrid accounting system and upholding the assessee&#039;s right to select the method of accounting for computing income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 13:57:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (2) TMI 90 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56397</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, emphasizing that the choice of the accounting method should be left to the assessee. The Tribunal directed the Income Tax Officer to compute the income based on the cash method chosen by the assessee, rejecting the hybrid accounting system and upholding the assessee&#039;s right to select the method of accounting for computing income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>