<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (3) TMI 130 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56391</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s findings, confirming the legitimacy of the gold ornaments and silver articles seized from the assessee. The explanations provided by the assessee were accepted, and the additions made by the Assessing Officer were deemed unjustified. Both the appeal and cross-objections were dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 13:42:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (3) TMI 130 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56391</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s findings, confirming the legitimacy of the gold ornaments and silver articles seized from the assessee. The explanations provided by the assessee were accepted, and the additions made by the Assessing Officer were deemed unjustified. Both the appeal and cross-objections were dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>