<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (4) TMI 79 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56383</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in various issues: the income earned by the assessee&#039;s wife was not taxable in the assessee&#039;s hands under Section 64; additions related to unexplained silver bars and gold ornaments were deleted; partial confirmation of additions related to jewellery and ornaments belonging to minor children was upheld; addition of unexplained income disclosed by the assessee was deleted; and share income from a partnership firm was not taxed in the assessee&#039;s hands. The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on wealth tax assessment issues. The IT appeal and cross-objection by the assessee were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 13:25:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (4) TMI 79 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56383</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in various issues: the income earned by the assessee&#039;s wife was not taxable in the assessee&#039;s hands under Section 64; additions related to unexplained silver bars and gold ornaments were deleted; partial confirmation of additions related to jewellery and ornaments belonging to minor children was upheld; addition of unexplained income disclosed by the assessee was deleted; and share income from a partnership firm was not taxed in the assessee&#039;s hands. The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on wealth tax assessment issues. The IT appeal and cross-objection by the assessee were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>