<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (11) TMI 70 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56377</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the disallowance of interest paid under s. 220(2) for non-payment of income tax. The Tribunal emphasized that interest for non-payment of taxes cannot be considered a business activity and should not be allowed as a deduction, as it goes against the purpose of levying and collecting tax on income. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected the disallowance of Rs. 300, which was not pressed by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 13:12:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (11) TMI 70 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56377</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the disallowance of interest paid under s. 220(2) for non-payment of income tax. The Tribunal emphasized that interest for non-payment of taxes cannot be considered a business activity and should not be allowed as a deduction, as it goes against the purpose of levying and collecting tax on income. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected the disallowance of Rs. 300, which was not pressed by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>