https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56376 The Tribunal held that the firm was entitled to registration despite some partners not contributing capital as required by the partnership deed. The Tribunal emphasized that non-contribution of capital did not impact the firm's genuineness and should not be a basis for denying registration. It differentiated the case from previous decisions and highlighted that the partnership deed should be upheld regardless of breaches. The appeals challenging the registration denial were dismissed. en-us Tue, 03 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Dec 2010 13:11:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56376 The Tribunal held that the firm was entitled to registration despite some partners not contributing capital as required by the partnership deed. The Tribunal emphasized that non-contribution of capital did not impact the firm's genuineness and should not be a basis for denying registration. It differentiated the case from previous decisions and highlighted that the partnership deed should be upheld regardless of breaches. The appeals challenging the registration denial were dismissed. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 03 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56376