<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (7) TMI 144 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56373</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in the case involving a wholesale tea dealer. The Tribunal found no justification for a lump sum addition to income due to a decrease in Gross Profit percentage, as the assessee had consistently shown varying rates in line with market conditions. Additionally, the disallowance of Kharajat expenses was overturned by the Tribunal due to lack of verification, emphasizing the need for proper scrutiny before disallowing expenses. The charge of interest under section 215 of the Income Tax Act was deemed consequential and modified accordingly, resulting in the appeal being allowed and the cross-objection dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 13:06:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (7) TMI 144 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56373</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in the case involving a wholesale tea dealer. The Tribunal found no justification for a lump sum addition to income due to a decrease in Gross Profit percentage, as the assessee had consistently shown varying rates in line with market conditions. Additionally, the disallowance of Kharajat expenses was overturned by the Tribunal due to lack of verification, emphasizing the need for proper scrutiny before disallowing expenses. The charge of interest under section 215 of the Income Tax Act was deemed consequential and modified accordingly, resulting in the appeal being allowed and the cross-objection dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>