<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (5) TMI 82 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56371</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the decisions of the lower authorities, dismissing the appeal. The first issue involved the exemption of an amount received from a superannuation fund under section 10(13)(ii), with the tribunal ruling that temporary incapacity leading to resignation qualifies for exemption. The second issue concerned the exemption of leave salary under section 10(10AA), with the tribunal allowing the exemption based on a precedent that the provision applies even in cases of voluntary retirement through resignation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 13:03:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (5) TMI 82 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56371</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the decisions of the lower authorities, dismissing the appeal. The first issue involved the exemption of an amount received from a superannuation fund under section 10(13)(ii), with the tribunal ruling that temporary incapacity leading to resignation qualifies for exemption. The second issue concerned the exemption of leave salary under section 10(10AA), with the tribunal allowing the exemption based on a precedent that the provision applies even in cases of voluntary retirement through resignation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>