<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (1) TMI 140 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56350</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, reinstating the ITO&#039;s original assessment order. The delay in filing appeals was condoned due to oversight by the Chartered Accountant. Higher depreciation and investment allowance on dumpers and water tanks were granted, with the Tribunal finding the CIT&#039;s order under section 263 regarding depreciation and investment allowance to be invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 12:10:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (1) TMI 140 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56350</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, reinstating the ITO&#039;s original assessment order. The delay in filing appeals was condoned due to oversight by the Chartered Accountant. Higher depreciation and investment allowance on dumpers and water tanks were granted, with the Tribunal finding the CIT&#039;s order under section 263 regarding depreciation and investment allowance to be invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>