https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56330 The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant as the Commissioner's order to levy additional wealth tax was deemed invalid and quashed. The Commissioner had exceeded the scope of the original proceedings by directing the Wealth Tax Officer to levy additional wealth tax on lands owned by the appellant, which was not part of the initial issues. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner had strayed beyond the directions set by the predecessor's order that was subsequently set aside, leading to the conclusion that the additional wealth tax was beyond the scope of the original proceedings and the subsequent Tribunal decision. en-us Fri, 20 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Dec 2010 11:04:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56330 The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant as the Commissioner's order to levy additional wealth tax was deemed invalid and quashed. The Commissioner had exceeded the scope of the original proceedings by directing the Wealth Tax Officer to levy additional wealth tax on lands owned by the appellant, which was not part of the initial issues. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner had strayed beyond the directions set by the predecessor's order that was subsequently set aside, leading to the conclusion that the additional wealth tax was beyond the scope of the original proceedings and the subsequent Tribunal decision. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 20 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56330