<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (1) TMI 81 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56291</link>
    <description>The tribunal granted the assessee the benefit of the doubt regarding proof of Mens rea, deleting the penalties and allowing the appeals. The decision was based on understanding that the assessee&#039;s actions were not necessarily indicative of intentional concealment, considering complexities and lack of coordination in the assessment process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 18:08:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (1) TMI 81 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56291</link>
      <description>The tribunal granted the assessee the benefit of the doubt regarding proof of Mens rea, deleting the penalties and allowing the appeals. The decision was based on understanding that the assessee&#039;s actions were not necessarily indicative of intentional concealment, considering complexities and lack of coordination in the assessment process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>