<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (1) TMI 74 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56275</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to grant registration to a partnership firm under the IT Act for the assessment year 1976-77. The dispute arose from partners not signing the partnership deed by the specified deadline, leading to the Income Tax Officer&#039;s refusal of registration. The Tribunal emphasized that all partners must sign the deed for registration, and rectifications cannot cure initial defects. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, as denying registration would result in double taxation of partners&#039; income already assessed individually. The firm was granted registration based on legal analysis and precedents cited in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 17:36:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (1) TMI 74 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56275</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to grant registration to a partnership firm under the IT Act for the assessment year 1976-77. The dispute arose from partners not signing the partnership deed by the specified deadline, leading to the Income Tax Officer&#039;s refusal of registration. The Tribunal emphasized that all partners must sign the deed for registration, and rectifications cannot cure initial defects. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, as denying registration would result in double taxation of partners&#039; income already assessed individually. The firm was granted registration based on legal analysis and precedents cited in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>