<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (11) TMI 64 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56257</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the profit from the property sale should be taxed as capital gains rather than business income. The Tribunal found that the Revenue failed to establish that the property was purchased with the intention of resale or that the appellant engaged in property dealing activities. The appellant&#039;s consistent treatment of properties as investments and the absence of evidence supporting the Revenue&#039;s claims led to the decision in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 17:02:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94719" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (11) TMI 64 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56257</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the profit from the property sale should be taxed as capital gains rather than business income. The Tribunal found that the Revenue failed to establish that the property was purchased with the intention of resale or that the appellant engaged in property dealing activities. The appellant&#039;s consistent treatment of properties as investments and the absence of evidence supporting the Revenue&#039;s claims led to the decision in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>