<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 153 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56227</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, ruling that Section 167A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was not applicable to the assessee. The tax would be payable at the rate ordinarily applicable to the total income of an AOP, not at the maximum marginal rate. The tribunal emphasized that Board Circulars, even if deviating from statutory provisions, are binding on Income-tax Officers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 14:44:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 153 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56227</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, ruling that Section 167A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was not applicable to the assessee. The tax would be payable at the rate ordinarily applicable to the total income of an AOP, not at the maximum marginal rate. The tribunal emphasized that Board Circulars, even if deviating from statutory provisions, are binding on Income-tax Officers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>