<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (1) TMI 60 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56202</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeals. It concluded that the income earned by the trust from the partnership firm should not be treated as the personal income of the trustee. The Tribunal found that the Income-tax Officer&#039;s reopening of the assessment and application of Section 60 were not justified. It emphasized the significance of proper communication and coordination between assessing officers to prevent repetitive inquiries and unnecessary hardships.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 12:45:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (1) TMI 60 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56202</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeals. It concluded that the income earned by the trust from the partnership firm should not be treated as the personal income of the trustee. The Tribunal found that the Income-tax Officer&#039;s reopening of the assessment and application of Section 60 were not justified. It emphasized the significance of proper communication and coordination between assessing officers to prevent repetitive inquiries and unnecessary hardships.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>