<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 237 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56180</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to apply section 50(2) of the Income-tax Act for computing short-term capital gains on the sale of the Pinsel unit. The full value of the sale consideration was determined at Rs. 2,10,08,445, rejecting the assessee&#039;s claim for only Rs. 55,00,000. The ITAT&#039;s decision was supported by the specific values attributed to various assets in the sale agreement, aligning with established legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 11:24:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 237 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56180</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to apply section 50(2) of the Income-tax Act for computing short-term capital gains on the sale of the Pinsel unit. The full value of the sale consideration was determined at Rs. 2,10,08,445, rejecting the assessee&#039;s claim for only Rs. 55,00,000. The ITAT&#039;s decision was supported by the specific values attributed to various assets in the sale agreement, aligning with established legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>