<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (3) TMI 96 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56165</link>
    <description>A co-operative society&#039;s year-end payment to member societies was treated as part of the milk purchase price, not a distribution of profits, where provisional rates were later adjusted under a continuing commercial arrangement. Group insurance premium was allowed because it had a direct business nexus in securing milk supply. Professional fees were partly disallowed under section 80VV to the extent referable to covered proceedings, while a 90% deduction under section 80P(2)(e) was upheld for storage charges on an estimated 10% attributable expense. Interest under sections 215 and 216 was found not leviable on the facts, and the reserve fund issue under section 67 of the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act required fresh examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 10:26:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (3) TMI 96 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56165</link>
      <description>A co-operative society&#039;s year-end payment to member societies was treated as part of the milk purchase price, not a distribution of profits, where provisional rates were later adjusted under a continuing commercial arrangement. Group insurance premium was allowed because it had a direct business nexus in securing milk supply. Professional fees were partly disallowed under section 80VV to the extent referable to covered proceedings, while a 90% deduction under section 80P(2)(e) was upheld for storage charges on an estimated 10% attributable expense. Interest under sections 215 and 216 was found not leviable on the facts, and the reserve fund issue under section 67 of the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act required fresh examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>