<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 164 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56158</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the sum of Rs. 15 lacs received for relinquishing tenancy rights was taxable as a capital receipt. The Tribunal rejected the assessee&#039;s argument that there was no cost of acquisition for the tenancy rights and confirmed that the differential interest paid over the years should be considered as the cost of acquisition. The appeal was dismissed, directing the Assessing Officer to determine the cost of acquisition based on the discounted value of the differential interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 09:59:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 164 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56158</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the sum of Rs. 15 lacs received for relinquishing tenancy rights was taxable as a capital receipt. The Tribunal rejected the assessee&#039;s argument that there was no cost of acquisition for the tenancy rights and confirmed that the differential interest paid over the years should be considered as the cost of acquisition. The appeal was dismissed, directing the Assessing Officer to determine the cost of acquisition based on the discounted value of the differential interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>