<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (10) TMI 57 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56150</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the ground that assessments were barred by limitation, rejected grounds related to non-deduction of liabilities and validity of reference to the Valuation Officer, and partially allowed appeals on the penalty levy under section 18(1)(a) by canceling the penalty for the period corresponding to the delay in filing income-tax returns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 18:48:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (10) TMI 57 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56150</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the ground that assessments were barred by limitation, rejected grounds related to non-deduction of liabilities and validity of reference to the Valuation Officer, and partially allowed appeals on the penalty levy under section 18(1)(a) by canceling the penalty for the period corresponding to the delay in filing income-tax returns.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>