<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (9) TMI 92 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56149</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decisions in dismissing the appeal. The incentive bonus was deemed part of salary with no additional deductions beyond those specified in section 16. Additionally, the addition of Rs. 11,700 for low-household expenses was affirmed due to insufficient evidence provided by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 18:45:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (9) TMI 92 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56149</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decisions in dismissing the appeal. The incentive bonus was deemed part of salary with no additional deductions beyond those specified in section 16. Additionally, the addition of Rs. 11,700 for low-household expenses was affirmed due to insufficient evidence provided by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56149</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>