<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (2) TMI 119 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56136</link>
    <description>The tribunal concluded that the penalty under section 273(1)(b) of the IT Act, 1961 could not be sustained. The appellant&#039;s belief regarding the carry forward of losses and royalty deductions was deemed bona fide, and the burden of proof was not met by the department. Additionally, the deletion of interest under section 215 supported the appellant&#039;s case. As a result, the penalty was cancelled, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 17:49:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (2) TMI 119 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56136</link>
      <description>The tribunal concluded that the penalty under section 273(1)(b) of the IT Act, 1961 could not be sustained. The appellant&#039;s belief regarding the carry forward of losses and royalty deductions was deemed bona fide, and the burden of proof was not met by the department. Additionally, the deletion of interest under section 215 supported the appellant&#039;s case. As a result, the penalty was cancelled, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>